krottc.blogg.se - Access notability online

A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article-perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.

" Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article.

For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.

" Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it.

Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected.

" Sources" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability.

Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language.

" Reliable" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline.

Martin Walker's statement, in a newspaper article about Bill Clinton, that "In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice" is plainly a trivial mention of that band.

The book-length history of IBM by Robert Sobel is plainly non-trivial coverage of IBM.

Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. " Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content.For Wikipedia's policies regarding content, see Neutral point of view, Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not, and Biographies of living persons.Ī topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. They do not limit the content of an article or list, though notability is commonly used as an inclusion criterion for lists (for example for listing out a school's alumni). These guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article. This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page.

It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right and.Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity-although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below.Ī topic is presumed to merit an article if: Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article.